From: swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!hellgate.utah.edu!csn!news.den.mmc.com!sims@ucsd.ed u (John Sims)
Subject: Rules of thumb
Date: 23 Aug 91 14:36:41 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1991Aug23.143641.6524@den.mmc.com> (raw)
Greetings, folks
We've been having some discussion in the office regarding
conversion to Ada from "other" languages. We've heard in the
folklore of computing that somewhere there is a government
regulation or guideline which states in effect that when you
must modify more than 30% of the SLOCs in a module, you must
re-write it in Ada. Can anyone validate/substantiate/repudiate
this data point or give me some leaders on where to pursue it
further? I would be most appreciative.
Thanks in advance
--
============================================================================
John Sims sims@den.mmc.com
OPINION? You mean my employer will let me have an opinion?
next reply other threads:[~1991-08-23 14:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1991-08-23 14:36 swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!hellgate.utah.edu!csn!news.den.mmc.com!sims [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1991-08-23 22:31 Rules of thumb cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!rela
1991-08-26 18:10 mvb.saic.com!eafbvax!eafbtems!martin
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox