From: ftpam1@acad3.alaska.edu (MUNTS PHILLIP A)
Subject: Re: AdaZ Validation?
Date: 21 Dec 90 13:28:34 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1990Dec21.132834.3779@ims.alaska.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 9012201150.AA05505@NSWC-WO.ARPA
In article <9012201150.AA05505@NSWC-WO.ARPA>, wdence@NSWC-WO.NAVY.MIL (Walter Dence) writes...
>
> AdaZ does not appear on the Nov90 or Dec90 validation lists. In
>addition it does not appear as being in line to be validated. I for
>one am extremely unhappy about unvalidated Ada compilers. Why have
>Ada if there is no discipline?
The first page of the manual, "Summary of Changes" lists as the last
item: "Validated under ACVC version 1.11."
On the other hand, it didn't come with a validation certificate like
another compiler I bought. On the third hand, I have only examined a small
sample (2) of compilers so I don't know whether the certificate is normal or
not.
You won't want to use AdaZ for production anyway.
Philip Munts N7AHL
NRA Extremist, etc.
University of Alaska, Fairbanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1990-12-21 13:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1990-12-20 11:50 AdaZ Validation? Walter Dence
1990-12-21 13:28 ` MUNTS PHILLIP A [this message]
1990-12-21 19:31 ` Richard Pattis
1990-12-21 22:03 ` Michael Feldman
1990-12-21 22:04 ` December 1990 Validated Compiler List Michael Feldman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1990-12-21 19:40 AdaZ Validation? Ashok P. Nadkarni
1990-12-22 1:16 ` MUNTS PHILLIP A
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox