From: hirchert@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (Kurt Hirchert)
Subject: Re: Recent CACM "viewpoint" article
Date: 11 Apr 90 19:03:24 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1990Apr11.190324.27161@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 8676@hubcap.clemson.edu
In fairness to Bailey, I would note
o Saying that some people have found the results of automatic translation
to be acceptable is quite different from saying the automatic translation
of Fortran programs is good enough to impose on the entire Fortran
community.
o Citing services such as Lexeme's ignores the fact that the use of their
service is not economically realistic for much of the Fortran community.
o Automatically translated programs won't necessarily produce an acceptable
level of performance. (Fortran's inbuilt restictions to allow high
performance are hard to mimic in a language which doesn't have them.
Certainly an Ada processor could have pragmas to assert similar
restrictions, but I am not aware of any that have such pragmas today.)
I'm not saying you shouldn't respond to Bailey's comments, but try to avoid
looking like language bigots or reactionaries.
--
Kurt W. Hirchert hirchert@ncsa.uiuc.edu
National Center for Supercomputing Applications
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1990-04-11 19:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1990-04-10 17:24 Recent CACM "viewpoint" article Bill Wolfe
1990-04-11 19:03 ` Kurt Hirchert [this message]
1990-04-11 19:44 ` Jerry Callen
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox