From: mfeldman@seas.gwu.edu (Michael Feldman)
Subject: Re: "silly" (?) Ada semantics
Date: 7 Jun 90 14:32:20 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1943@sparko.gwu.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: EACHUS.90Jun6182703@aries.linus.mitre.org
Thanks to Robert Eachus for giving just the authoritative and sensible
answer I was hoping for. IMHO it's important for language-bashers to
realize that the designers and proponents of the language they are bashing
are neither stupid nor juvenile. Obviously we will not all agree on the
desirability of a certain way of doing a certain feature - computer folks
are the most disputatious group I know - but it is unfair and juvenile
not to at least give the designers and proponents credit for having
thought it through. Just when I get so discouraged by the flame wars
that I'm ready to swear off reading the news, I see something that
reconfirms the mature and helpful side of it. It's these little "hits"
of good stuff that keep my addiction going. Thanks again.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1990-06-07 14:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1990-06-02 21:08 "silly" (?) Ada semantics Michael Feldman
1990-06-05 9:54 ` ken
1990-06-06 16:09 ` Michael Feldman
1990-06-06 22:27 ` Robert I. Eachus
1990-06-07 14:32 ` Michael Feldman [this message]
1990-06-06 18:12 ` Robert I. Eachus
1990-06-07 17:27 ` stt
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox