From: Patrick <patrick@spellingbeewinnars.org>
Subject: Re: LLVM and GCC (was: Forking old GMGPL libs ?)
Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2012 07:04:57 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2012-10-06T07:04:57-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <179fb696-1370-4a12-a700-aa0a1fd0869f@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87fw5rhmbv.fsf_-_@ludovic-brenta.org>
I'm home :) I love this list, thanks for all the great feedback
Thanks Stephen L and Florian
Hi Simon
"I think you may have the wrong end of the stick here."
I can see why you would say this. This is not the typical BSD vs GPL thing. I actually want the option to release under what IMHO would be a more restrictive license. There are a few no-commercial use licenses that look promising.
Thanks again Georg
Between your last post and a snippet from Simon's, I might be getting the picture now. Is it that GMGPL allows GPL code to ship without source but does not allow it to link to otherwise GPL incompatible code like BSD?
Hi Brian
GNAT is immense and I don't really think I have the skills to do anything with it but in a tribute to Ada, someone of my skill level can still read it. It is about 10X easier for me to read Ada then C. Thanks for the DragonEgg tip
Hi Ludovic
As always, it's great to see you helping on the list day in and day out :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-06 14:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-05 22:51 Forking old GMGPL libs ? Patrick
2012-10-05 23:52 ` Georg Bauhaus
2012-10-06 3:28 ` Patrick
2012-10-06 9:11 ` Georg Bauhaus
2012-10-06 4:52 ` Stephen Leake
2012-10-06 7:10 ` Florian Weimer
2012-10-06 8:10 ` Simon Wright
2012-10-06 9:45 ` Brian Drummond
2012-10-06 11:27 ` LLVM and GCC (was: Forking old GMGPL libs ?) Ludovic Brenta
2012-10-06 14:04 ` Patrick [this message]
2012-10-06 15:11 ` Brian Drummond
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox