From: Maciej Sobczak <see.my.homepage@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: On intended use cases of the distributed annex
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 07:36:12 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2014-09-25T07:36:12-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1758ff32-a2b2-4665-b249-f183be3d7714@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m00n4c$1c2$1@dont-email.me>
W dniu czwartek, 25 września 2014 11:26:38 UTC+2 użytkownik J-P. Rosen napisał:
> Right, but with PolyOrb you may have the same objects viewed as
> distributed Ada objects from Ada, and Corba objects from the rest of the
> world...
Except that CORBA is a technology that has lost its "cool factor" some decade or two ago and you might find it difficult to convince anybody in your team to write software using it. If Ada is *perceived* as an old technology that is no longer relevant in modern IT, then introducing CORBA into the picture will not help make Ada look any more attractive - now you have not one, but two old and irrelevant technologies to convince your colleagues to work with.
--
Maciej Sobczak * http://www.msobczak.com * http://www.inspirel.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-25 14:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-24 9:37 On intended use cases of the distributed annex Alejandro R. Mosteo
2014-09-24 10:08 ` tonyg
2014-09-24 10:09 ` tonyg
2014-09-24 10:09 ` Pascal Obry
2014-09-24 10:42 ` Alejandro R. Mosteo
2014-09-24 10:51 ` Alejandro R. Mosteo
2014-09-25 8:30 ` Maciej Sobczak
2014-09-25 9:26 ` J-P. Rosen
2014-09-25 14:36 ` Maciej Sobczak [this message]
2014-09-25 15:02 ` Brad Moore
2014-09-26 7:36 ` Maciej Sobczak
2014-09-30 5:44 ` Brad Moore
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox