From: Luke A. Guest <laguest@archeia.com>
Subject: Re: GNAT with LLVM -> Java Script
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 15:10:29 +0000 (UTC)
Date: 2014-10-16T15:10:29+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1703052331435164910.517977laguest-archeia.com@nntp.aioe.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: rnu%v.433118$Pp.363044@fx08.fr7
Brian Drummond <brian3@shapes.demon.co.uk> wrote:
.
>>
>> Yup.
>>
>> There are also the bindings that were written and then abandoned by
>> Duncan Sands, don't know if they are more advanced or not.
>>
>> Luke.
>
> That was the DragonEgg project, wasn't it? I got the impression it
> foundered on some shortcoming of LLVM for non-C languages; not certain
> which, but possibly the one regarding nested functions that Tristan has
> overcome with ghdl.
No, DragonEgg was the plugin that followed, think that's dead also.
But you're right, the nested function thing was a problem but I'm certain
Duncan said he was working will llvm way back to sort it out. Don't know
how far it got.
Luke
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-16 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-15 1:06 GNAT with LLVM -> Java Script David Botton
2014-10-15 1:47 ` Luke A. Guest
2014-10-15 2:54 ` David Botton
2014-10-15 9:15 ` Brian Drummond
2014-10-15 9:59 ` Lucretia
2014-10-15 13:10 ` Brian Drummond
2014-10-16 15:10 ` Luke A. Guest [this message]
2014-10-16 22:36 ` Georg Bauhaus
2014-10-17 7:38 ` duncan.sands
2014-10-17 10:53 ` Brian Drummond
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox