From: Peter Brooks <peter.h.m.brooks@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Ada-Python demo
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 02:16:17 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2013-07-15T02:16:17-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <169334c5-f79f-499a-b682-bdae0c05cb24@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <747d50ba-8076-4fc2-9e91-ce3923caa1f0@googlegroups.com>
On Monday, 15 July 2013 10:10:27 UTC+2, Maciej Sobczak wrote:
>
> Interestingly, as far as I know, *nobody* does it. In other words, nobody chooses to benefit from the freedom to use anything they like. Which kind of suggests that having a data model that works out of the box is perhaps a better idea than not having it and pretending that communication and data model are independent. Technically they are, but from the usability point of view they are closely related.
>
A lot of people design ontologies, they're very important, so far mainly in static but large repositories.
I'm keen on one for a much less static situation.
A also agree that XML is not a good basis, so I'd prefer work with dot and JSON.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-15 9:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-11 21:12 Ada-Python demo Maciej Sobczak
2013-07-12 5:57 ` Gour
2013-07-12 7:53 ` Maciej Sobczak
2013-07-12 8:33 ` Thomas Løcke
2013-07-12 10:40 ` Gour
2013-07-12 12:56 ` Marc C
2013-07-12 15:51 ` Gour
2013-07-12 17:11 ` Marc C
2013-07-12 19:16 ` Gour
2013-07-13 21:06 ` Maciej Sobczak
2013-07-15 6:43 ` Peter Brooks
2013-07-15 7:44 ` Georg Bauhaus
2013-07-15 8:10 ` Maciej Sobczak
2013-07-15 9:16 ` Peter Brooks [this message]
2013-07-15 17:44 ` Marc C
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox