From: Georg Bauhaus <rm-host.bauhaus@maps.arcor.de>
Subject: Re: if oo programming is the roman numerals of computing why add it?
Date: 09 Jul 2013 19:14:05 GMT
Date: 2013-07-09T21:14:05+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1683838578395089543.295091rm-host.bauhaus-maps.arcor.de@news.arcor.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 15dcebb2-1057-404e-9bcd-0858f163f4e6@googlegroups.com
johannes falcone <visphatesjava@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Monday, July 8, 2013 4:01:28 AM UTC-7, Dufr wrote:
>> On Sunday, July 7, 2013 10:50:54 PM UTC+2, johannes falcone wrote:
>>
>>> why?
>>
>>
>>
>> Troll !
>
> How dare you call me a troll.
>
> http://harmful.cat-v.org/software/OO_programming/
Luca Cardelli's article, featured on the page, has many comments
in favor of O-O, provided a language gets it right. If you read the
article, you will notice that Ada's style of O-O is very much like
Cardelli suggests it should be.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-09 19:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-07 20:50 if oo programming is the roman numerals of computing why add it? johannes falcone
2013-07-08 11:01 ` Dufr
2013-07-08 17:07 ` Pascal Obry
2013-07-09 0:19 ` johannes falcone
2013-07-09 19:14 ` Georg Bauhaus [this message]
2013-07-09 19:43 ` Adam Beneschan
2013-07-09 20:55 ` Randy Brukardt
2013-07-09 0:31 ` Adam Beneschan
2013-07-10 13:13 ` Martin
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox