From: howland.reston.ans.net!wupost!csus.edu!netcom.com!netcomsv!nitelog!michae l.hagerty@gatech.edu (Michael Hagerty)
Subject: NON-DEFENSE ADA APPLI
Date: 8 Jun 93 21:41:00 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1639.237.uupcb@nitelog.com> (raw)
On Mon, 7 Jun 1993, Tucker Taft posted to All:
TT. My suspicion is that if one looks at large, long-lived, reliable
. systems, one will find that Ada is being chosen for such systems
. at least as often as other languages. Almost all air-traffic
. control systems are being implemented in Ada these days.
>From the presentations made in past years at Tri-Ada, the fact that
one company made the unusual choice of selecting Ada for an air traffic
control system has served them in extremely good stead. Apparently
they are now getting around 80% black box reuse on building new systems
for other customers. Having an advantage like that really makes you
competitive...
Of course, C++ class libraries are beginning to provide some of these
same features. However, I seem to have difficulty finding C++ users
who are totally able to eschew the less than desirable features of C
(in the interests of efficiency, of course)...
Regards, Mikey <michael.hagerty@nitelog.com>
---
. MR/2 1.50 #63 . Being good at being stupid doesn't count.
reply other threads:[~1993-06-08 21:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox