From: joe@petsd.UUCP (Joe Orost)
Subject: Re: Record rep specs for private components
Date: 17 Jun 89 16:43:01 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1634@petsd.UUCP> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1620@petsd.UUCP
In article <1620@petsd.UUCP> I write:
>We're having a discussion within the posix-ada group about the legality of
>record rep-specs for record components of a private type. I want to find
>out what current compilers accept. Can a few of you try this on various Ada
>compilers (Don't bother if you have VERDIX or SYSTEAM; I tried those):
>
> package a is
> type aa is private;
> private
> type aa is range 0..1000;
> end a;
>
> with a;
> package b is
> type bb is record
> bbb : a.aa;
> end record;
> for bb use record
> at mod 2;
> bbb at 0 range 0..15; --Legal?
> end record;
> x : bb;
> end b;
>
Here is the summary:
Compiler Legal?
V Y
S N
D Y
A Y
Looks like compiler S has a problem.
--joe@petsd.ccur.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1989-06-17 16:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1989-06-10 0:16 Record rep specs for private components Joe Orost
1989-06-17 16:43 ` Joe Orost [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1989-06-18 14:30 Edward Berard
1989-06-20 13:06 ` Joe Orost
1989-06-23 19:57 ` Goodenough
1989-06-24 16:30 ` Edward Berard
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox