From: rcd@ico.ISC.COM (Dick Dunn)
Subject: Re: Objectification
Date: 7 Aug 89 23:00:03 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15991@vail.ICO.ISC.COM> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 534@ajpo.sei.cmu.edu
eberard@ajpo.sei.cmu.edu (Edward Berard) writes about many matters and
meta-matters roughly related to OOP and moving toward it. All well, but
couldn't someone come up with a better word (or perhaps I should just say
"a word") for the concept? "Objectification" is sufficiently ugly and
silly-sounding (sounds like it came out of a congressional committee) to be
an impediment to the goals.
--
Dick Dunn rcd@ico.isc.com uucp: {ncar,nbires}!ico!rcd (303)449-2870
...Simpler is better.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1989-08-07 23:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1989-08-03 21:39 Objectification Edward Berard
1989-08-05 3:07 ` Objectification Jerome_V_Vollborn
1989-08-05 3:43 ` Objectification Jerome_V_Vollborn
1989-08-07 23:00 ` Dick Dunn [this message]
1989-08-08 12:54 ` Objectification Edward Berard
1989-08-08 16:47 ` Objectification Paul Scherf;685-2734;61-028;692-4142;orca
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox