From: aem@ibiza.Miami.Edu (a.e.mossberg)
Subject: Re: Subliminal
Date: 15 Apr 89 01:53:02 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1571@umbio.MIAMI.EDU> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 6462@medusa.cs.purdue.edu
In <6462@medusa.cs.purdue.edu>, <rjh@cs.purdue.EDU> wrote:
>I sincerely hope RFC 1097 is a joke, subliminal suggestion is a devious and
>underhanded way to influence people into taking actions or adopt ideas
>without their consent. People should be afraid to look at terminals if
>there is a possibility subliminal messages are being sent. Why isn't this
>practice illegal? I vote for a complete banning of subliminal messages from
>any electronic medium and propose for now a banning of subliminal messages
>across the Internet. Subliminal messages are a dangerous threat to our
>security and the integrity of the Internet.
Not to mention a threat to our precious bodily
fluids.... :-) :-)
aem
a.e.mossberg - aem@mthvax.miami.edu - aem@miavax.SPAN - aem@umiami.BITNET
As for critisism, do it in good time; don't get into the habit of criticizing
only after the event. - Chairman Mao
prev parent reply other threads:[~1989-04-15 1:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1989-04-08 3:14 Subliminal Bob Hathaway
1989-04-10 16:22 ` Subliminal Bob Sutterfield
1989-04-10 18:07 ` RFC1097 (was Re: Subliminal) Ritchey Ruff
1989-04-10 17:08 ` Subliminal dd
1989-04-15 1:53 ` a.e.mossberg [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox