From: schwartz@dinl.uucp (Michael Schwartz)
Subject: Re: Use of "is separate" and compilatio
Date: 4 Dec 89 16:52:44 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1501@dinl.mmc.UUCP> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 60@array.UUCP
> why do we need 'is separate'
This is just another tool to break up long files (and thus reduce
the burden of changes for recompilation).
Imagine a package with a task embedded in the body (easy to
imagine). Imagine the task is substantial. The task spec can
appear in the body, while the task body 'is separate'.
--
-----------------------
schwartz@pogo.den.mmc.com "Expect everything ...
mschwartz@mmc.com and the unexpected never happens."
ncar!dinl!schwartz --the phantom tollbooth
DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressesed are not necessarily those of my
employer or myself.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1989-12-04 16:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1989-11-27 20:29 Use of "is separate" and compilatio stt
1989-11-28 17:40 ` Ed Matthews
1989-11-29 20:16 ` arny.b.engelson
1989-12-01 18:29 ` Leonard Vanek
1989-12-04 16:52 ` Michael Schwartz [this message]
1989-12-06 12:54 ` Mike Walsh
1989-12-07 23:32 ` Fred Stluka
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1989-11-29 17:43 stt
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox