From: Eryndlia Mavourneen <eryndlia@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: User-Defined Reference in a Task Type Discriminant Compiler Bug?
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 18:15:51 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2013-03-21T18:15:51-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <14f4cce6-f418-4c70-8f21-bd44744feeba@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ef5e6b7-aab3-4229-a245-97dfc5861b8d@googlegroups.com>
Yes. Thank you, everyone. I agree with Randy that it is virtually useless; however, it seemed to me to be legal Ada and so I decided to see how far I could push the definition. That little word "anonymous" makes a lot of sense. I am coming to a much better appreciation of why Ada uses it.
I will play with it a little more in the morning.
-- Eryndlia F. Mavourneen
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-22 1:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-21 15:11 User-Defined Reference in a Task Type Discriminant Compiler Bug? Eryndlia Mavourneen
2013-03-21 19:11 ` Shark8
2013-03-21 19:12 ` Adam Beneschan
2013-03-21 19:43 ` Simon Wright
2013-03-21 23:49 ` Randy Brukardt
2013-03-22 1:15 ` Eryndlia Mavourneen [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox