From: Martin Krischik <krischik@users.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: Generic formal access types
Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 11:58:41 +0200
Date: 2003-05-01T11:58:41+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1459423.SpdnhGgvRt@linux1.krischik.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3eb0e397@epflnews.epfl.ch
Rodrigo Garcï¿œa <rodrigo.garcia.ARROBA.epfl.ch> wrote:
should
generic
type Access_Type is private;
Null_Value : Access_Type := nul;
not work as well?
Regards
Martin
> That seems a nice workaround, although I still have to pass two
> parameters during instantiation. I will give it a try!
>
> Thanks,
>
> Rodrigo
>
> Chad R. Meiners wrote:
>
> How about
>
> generic
> type Access_Type is private;
> Null_Value : Access_Type;
>
> -CRM
--
mailto://krischik@users.sourceforge.net
http://www.ada.krischik.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-01 9:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-30 18:30 Generic formal access types
2003-04-30 19:27 ` Simon Wright
2003-05-01 8:58 `
2003-04-30 21:42 ` Chad R. Meiners
2003-05-01 9:06 `
2003-05-01 9:58 ` Martin Krischik [this message]
2003-05-01 13:00 `
2003-05-02 9:14 ` Ludovic Brenta
2003-05-02 10:43 `
2003-05-02 10:50 `
2003-05-01 10:09 `
2003-05-02 1:14 ` tmoran
2003-05-02 9:52 `
2003-05-02 16:18 ` tmoran
2003-05-02 16:57 ` Robert A Duff
2003-05-02 19:39 ` Randy Brukardt
2003-05-05 8:14 `
2003-05-05 16:40 ` Matthew Heaney
2003-05-05 17:34 ` Robert A Duff
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox