From: pattis@cs.washington.edu (Richard Pattis)
Subject: Re: AdaZ Validation?
Date: 21 Dec 90 19:31:58 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <14229@june.cs.washington.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 9012201150.AA05505@NSWC-WO.ARPA
In article <9012201150.AA05505@NSWC-WO.ARPA>, wdence@NSWC-WO.NAVY.MIL (Walter Dence) writes:
>
> AdaZ does not appear on the Nov90 or Dec90 validation lists. In
> addition it does not appear as being in line to be validated. I for
> one am extremely unhappy about unvalidated Ada compilers. Why have
> Ada if there is no discipline?
AdaZ is a product that uses the standard Meridian compiler, so I'm nor sure
if AdaZ (the product) must be validated independently of the compiler it
uses. Am I missing something?
Rich Pattis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1990-12-21 19:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1990-12-20 11:50 AdaZ Validation? Walter Dence
1990-12-21 13:28 ` MUNTS PHILLIP A
1990-12-21 19:31 ` Richard Pattis [this message]
1990-12-21 22:03 ` Michael Feldman
1990-12-21 22:04 ` December 1990 Validated Compiler List Michael Feldman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1990-12-21 19:40 AdaZ Validation? Ashok P. Nadkarni
1990-12-22 1:16 ` MUNTS PHILLIP A
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox