From: Pascal Obry <pascal@obry.net>
Subject: Re: Unchecked_Union record inside an other record - trouble
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2014 22:06:45 +0200
Date: 2014-08-08T22:06:45+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1407528405.3418.43.camel@pascal.home.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: ls3a0s$keb$2@speranza.aioe.org
Le vendredi 08 août 2014 à 22:56 +0300, Victor Porton a écrit :
> For records interfacing with C it SHOULD be ignored completely. Because it
> is C.
But again in Ada all must be explicit, this probably fall under this
rule. And what if you want to emulate the Ada tag on the C side and
actually have the tag exported? Not sure this is a real example as it
heavily depends on the compiler (and so the generated code).
--
Pascal Obry / Magny Les Hameaux (78)
The best way to travel is by means of imagination
http://v2p.fr.eu.org
http://www.obry.net
gpg --keyserver keys.gnupg.net --recv-key F949BD3B
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-08 20:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-08 15:36 Unchecked_Union record inside an other record - trouble Victor Porton
2014-08-08 16:01 ` Adam Beneschan
2014-08-08 16:56 ` Victor Porton
2014-08-08 18:52 ` Shark8
2014-08-08 19:56 ` Victor Porton
2014-08-08 20:06 ` Pascal Obry [this message]
2014-08-08 20:09 ` Shark8
2014-08-08 20:12 ` Victor Porton
2014-08-08 20:22 ` Shark8
2014-08-08 20:28 ` Victor Porton
2014-08-08 21:07 ` Shark8
2014-08-08 19:52 ` Victor Porton
2014-08-08 19:57 ` Adam Beneschan
2014-08-08 19:21 ` Per Sandberg
2014-08-08 20:01 ` Victor Porton
2014-08-08 21:23 ` Jeffrey Carter
2014-08-10 7:25 ` Per Sandberg
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox