From: Martin Krischik <krischik@users.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: sed and perl - yuck [Was Re: Preprocessor functionality equivalent ideas needed]
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 21:52:25 +0100
Date: 2003-12-16T21:52:25+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1324276.yJNICJfKoU@linux1.krischik.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: brlkaa$h1h$1@panorama.wcss.wroc.pl
Waldek Hebisch wrote:
> Martin Krischik (krischik@users.sourceforge.net) wrote:
> : Ludovic Brenta wrote:
>
> : > Another approach could be to simulate a preprocessor with sed or perl
> : > scripts.
>
> : Did that, hated it and wrote AdaCL. If you rather use Ada then perl and
> : find find sed cumbersome you should look at AdaCL.
>
> : If you disagree: Write a sed line which inserst "OS." bevore every
> : CD_Recorder - but only if it is not allready there.
>
> Well, if you have unused chars (say ';' and '#') the task is easy:
>
> s/CD_Recorder/;CD_Recorder/g
> s/OS\.;/OS.#/
> s/;CD_Recorder/OS.CD_Recorder/g
> s/[;#]//g
>
> If all chars are used one have to quote first:
>
> s/./:&/g
> s/:C:D:_:R:e:c:o:r:d:e:r/;::C:D:_:R:e:c:o:r:d:e:r/g
> s/:O:S:\.;:/:O:S:.;#/g
> s/;::C:D:_:R:e:c:o:r:d:e:r/:O:S:.:C:D:_:R:e:c:o:r:d:e:r/g
> s/;#:/:/g
> s/.\(.\)/\1/g
> I have not put them on sigle line for readability.
Cool. But you do prove my point: sed is to compicated. Isn't Ada a lot
easier to read then sed:
AdaCL.SAR.Filter.List.Append (
C => Filters,
Elem => AdaCL.SAR.Filter.Insert.Text.New_Object (
SearchString => "AdaCL.Trace",
InsertString => ".. ",
Search_At => AdaCL.SAR.Filter.Insert.First,
Insert_At => AdaCL.SAR.Filter.Insert.Before));
To much to type? With use and rename you could reduce it to:
Append (Flt, IT.New_Object ("AdaCL.Trace", ".. ", First, Before));
But we are Ada programers so we don't do that, do we.
> The above is
> slightly off-topic, but I think it ilustrates nicely that a sequence
> of simple steps can give result looking quite different then a single
> step. In that spirit Ada discourages preprocessors (since complexity
> grows quite a lot).
Yes true. However, in OS dependen programming you might have package which
is 90% the same and differ in 10%.
Still, I might give some of the ideas here are thought and maybe I get rid
of gnatprep.
With Regards
Martin
--
mailto://krischik@users.sourceforge.net
http://www.ada.krischik.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-16 20:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-10 20:04 Preprocessor functionality equivalent ideas needed Greg Milford
2003-12-10 21:41 ` Ludovic Brenta
2003-12-11 17:12 ` sed and perl - yuck [Was Re: Preprocessor functionality equivalent ideas needed] Martin Krischik
2003-12-16 0:40 ` Waldek Hebisch
2003-12-16 20:52 ` Martin Krischik [this message]
2003-12-10 22:29 ` Preprocessor functionality equivalent ideas needed Georg Bauhaus
2003-12-12 5:52 ` Simon Wright
2003-12-11 1:07 ` Jeffrey Carter
2003-12-11 13:34 ` Marin David Condic
2003-12-11 17:49 ` Jeffrey Carter
2003-12-11 5:39 ` Steve
2003-12-11 16:59 ` Martin Krischik
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox