From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Subject: Re: Passing indefinite types
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 09:07:27 +0100
Date: 2013-02-03T09:07:27+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <12f0uuiyq6eez.1pibxapmoi0y6.dlg@40tude.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 4b47f227-4f52-49b3-b9bf-53a6d4f60263@googlegroups.com
On Sat, 2 Feb 2013 16:27:32 -0800 (PST), sbelmont700@gmail.com wrote:
> On Saturday, February 2, 2013 4:31:06 PM UTC-5, Jeffrey Carter wrote:
>>
>> How about an indefinite container?
>
> I had considered it, but that only works for non-limited types, and, ultimately, uses the heap.
A custom storage pool then? Sometimes I am using stack or pool
mark-and-release pools. That would mean access types of course.
--
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-03 8:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-02 21:07 Passing indefinite types sbelmont700
2013-02-02 21:31 ` Jeffrey Carter
2013-02-03 0:27 ` sbelmont700
2013-02-03 8:07 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov [this message]
2013-02-03 10:22 ` gautier_niouzes
2013-02-03 22:26 ` Stephen Leake
2013-02-04 1:25 ` sbelmont700
2013-02-04 3:46 ` Shark8
2013-02-05 2:40 ` Randy Brukardt
2013-02-05 13:01 ` Stephen Leake
2013-02-05 20:56 ` Randy Brukardt
2013-02-05 21:16 ` sbelmont700
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox