From: Shark8 <onewingedshark@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: GNAT.Serial_Communication and Streams
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 00:45:22 -0800 (PST)
Date: 2015-11-29T00:45:22-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <12af12c0-b497-418c-9664-8f91c17df1e3@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dgyykfsg080f.qn87qly600iw.dlg@40tude.net>
On Wednesday, November 25, 2015 at 10:43:27 AM UTC-7, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
> This immediately follows from being "implementation-defined."
> Implementation-defined = [forall] not defined.
Ridiculous.
Just because the standard makes [e.g.] the Address type implementation defined does not mean that the Address type has no definition, or that absolutely any possible implementation conforms to all requirements. For example the actual range of Standard.Integer is implementation defined, but it cannot be 0..255 because that would not meet the minimum range requirements for Standard.Integer.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-29 8:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-22 21:40 GNAT.Serial_Communication and Streams rrr.eee.27
2015-11-22 21:52 ` Simon Wright
2015-11-22 21:54 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2015-11-24 1:29 ` Randy Brukardt
2015-11-24 16:09 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2015-11-24 8:28 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2015-11-24 10:28 ` Simon Wright
2015-11-24 10:45 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2015-11-25 6:24 ` Shark8
2015-11-25 8:07 ` Simon Wright
2015-11-25 8:52 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2015-11-25 12:45 ` Shark8
2015-11-25 17:43 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2015-11-29 8:45 ` Shark8 [this message]
2015-11-29 9:33 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2015-11-29 11:34 ` Simon Wright
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox