From: grover%brahmand@Sun.COM (Vinod Grover)
Subject: Re: Inheritance & limited private types
Date: 22 Oct 89 07:00:04 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <126675@sun.Eng.Sun.COM> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 6845@hubcap.clemson.edu
In article <6845@hubcap.clemson.edu> billwolf%hazel.cs.clemson.edu@hubcap.clemson.edu writes:
> It has long been recognized that the time to worry about product
> efficiency is AFTER the product has been developed and put through
> a profiler to determine where the bottlenecks are in the system,
> since in this way the high cost of maximizing efficiency can be
> directed to the points at which it will do the most good.
For those of us without profilers, I suppose, there is no hope. Or perhaps
we should worry about efficiency before the product has been developed, or
perhaps not to worry about efficiency at all.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1989-10-22 7:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1989-10-16 13:57 Does Ada really need MULTIPLE inheritance? "Norman H. Cohen"
1989-10-17 17:23 ` David A Eichmann,316K
1989-10-17 20:49 ` David Chase
1989-10-21 19:39 ` Inheritance & limited private types William Thomas Wolfe, 2847
1989-10-22 7:00 ` Vinod Grover [this message]
1989-10-22 18:03 ` Inheritance & limited private t stt
1989-10-22 20:22 ` Inheritance & limited private types Barry Margolin
1989-10-23 0:39 ` Ted Dunning
1989-10-27 15:44 ` Paul Pedersen
1989-10-27 17:50 ` Robert Firth
1989-10-27 22:32 ` Profiling (was Re: Inheritance & limited private types) Barry Margolin
1989-10-27 0:04 ` Inheritance & limited private types Dick Karpinski
1989-10-30 17:12 ` Does Ada really need MULTIPLE inheritance? Paul Baker
1989-10-19 2:27 ` William Thomas Wolfe, 2847
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox