From: Luke A. Guest <laguest@archeia.com>
Subject: Re: Accessibility check failure with Implicit_Dereference aspect
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 18:38:34 +0000 (UTC)
Date: 2014-08-13T18:38:34+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1265553776429647827.181612laguest-archeia.com@nntp.aioe.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 85egwku558.fsf@stephe-leake.org
Stephen Leake <stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org> wrote:
> accessibility checks have to do with not creating dangling pointers;
> they depend on exactly where the type is declared and where the access
> value is created and used. So we need to see the entire program to help.
>
> In general, if the access type is at library level, there will be no
> accessibility issues.
Thanks but I got it sorted and deleted this post.
It was an anonymous access type in the controlled type and freeing based on
a defined access type.
Like
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-13 18:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-12 17:03 Accessibility check failure with Implicit_Dereference aspect Lucretia
2014-08-13 9:10 ` Stephen Leake
2014-08-13 18:38 ` Luke A. Guest [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox