From: Bryan@SIERRA.STANFORD.EDU (Doug Bryan)
Subject: 3.5.9/9
Date: Thu, 4-Dec-86 20:08:54 EST [thread overview]
Date: Thu Dec 4 20:08:54 1986
Message-ID: <12260225279.28.BRYAN@Sierra.Stanford.EDU> (raw)
is paragraph 9 of section 3.5.9 really correct? if so, what use is
the fixed accuration definition when defining either a subtype or a new
base type?
doug
-------
reply other threads:[~1986-12-05 1:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox