* /. Ultra-Stable Software Design in C++? @ 2006-02-06 17:06 Martin Krischik 2006-02-06 19:25 ` Mark Lorenzen 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Martin Krischik @ 2006-02-06 17:06 UTC (permalink / raw) Hi everybody. The title allready says it all. But if you want to see for yourself: http://ask.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/02/05/0119223 Martin -- mailto://krischik@users.sourceforge.net Ada programming at: http://ada.krischik.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: /. Ultra-Stable Software Design in C++? 2006-02-06 17:06 /. Ultra-Stable Software Design in C++? Martin Krischik @ 2006-02-06 19:25 ` Mark Lorenzen 2006-02-07 1:30 ` flaran 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Mark Lorenzen @ 2006-02-06 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw) Martin Krischik <krischik@users.sourceforge.net> writes: > Hi everybody. > > The title allready says it all. But if you want to see for yourself: > > http://ask.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/02/05/0119223 > Yeah I saw it, but I didn't even want to start... - Mark ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: /. Ultra-Stable Software Design in C++? 2006-02-06 19:25 ` Mark Lorenzen @ 2006-02-07 1:30 ` flaran 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: flaran @ 2006-02-07 1:30 UTC (permalink / raw) Okay, I really want to know exactly how this relates to Ada? We aren't here to discuss what is better than Ada. Maybe you should stick this stuff in comp.lang.C++ or not at all. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-02-07 1:30 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2006-02-06 17:06 /. Ultra-Stable Software Design in C++? Martin Krischik 2006-02-06 19:25 ` Mark Lorenzen 2006-02-07 1:30 ` flaran
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox