Re: DragonEgg has been revived

[Luke A. Guest <laguest@archeia.com>]

Dan'l Miller <optikos@verizon.net> wrote:
> On Thursday, May 24, 2018 at 4:59:43 PM UTC-5, Chris M Moore wrote:
>> On 24/05/2018 20:26, Dan'l Miller wrote:
>>> Specifically where in the set {GPLv3, RLEv3.1, copyright law's body of
>>> statutes in USCode, copyright treaties to which the USA is a signatory}
>>> does it overtly clearly say anything even remotely in the ballpark of
>>> that sentence above?  I want to read it with my own eyes.  I want
>>> reading comprehension.  (And hearsay commentary on some forum from 2009
>>> where people speculate and parrot what other people say doesn't count;
>>> I want original sources and seminal references, such as quotations from
>>> members of that set above.)
>> 
>> I mean who uses "overtly clearly"?
> 
> Someone who wants to arrive directly rapidly at the •fully correct•
> answer within the root/seminal normative reference-documents—as opposed
> to the alternative:  ‘10 blind men in India feeling different parts of
> the elephant’, jawboning the same-old same-old parroted
> partially-correct/cherrypicked hearsay for yet another 10 years.


WTF are you banging on about? That made no sense and had no point and was
soooo long winded.

<stripped out pointless ramblings>