From: Jerry <lanceboyle@qwest.net>
Subject: Re: Is it Ada 2005 or Ada 2007?
Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2007 13:55:11 -0800
Date: 2007-11-04T13:55:11-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1194213311.444949.278220@y27g2000pre.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fgkcmf$5q5$1@ikaria.belnet.be>
On Nov 4, 5:07 am, d...@cs.kuleuven.ac.be (Dirk Craeynest) wrote:
> Jerry <lancebo...@qwest.net> wrote:
> >On Oct 30, 3:16 pm, Jerry <lancebo...@qwest.net> wrote:
> >> I have seen the "new" Ada referred to as both Ada 2005 and Ada 2007.
> [...]
> >> Is there an official designation or
> >> are left to our own devices to call it what we want?
>
> >Thanks for your comments. On balance, things seem as confused as I had
> >feared.
>
> This issue is very clear, but some postings here seem to be confused.
>
> The internationally accepted recommendation to refer to the latest
> Ada language definition is to use the informal name "Ada 2005".
>
> See <http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.ada/msg/f1cf1036a71fca56>
>
> Dirk Craeynest, Dirk.Craeyn...@cs.kuleuven.be
> ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22/WG9, Head of Delegation, Belgium
Thanks, Dirk. 2005 it is.
Jerry
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-04 21:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-30 22:16 Is it Ada 2005 or Ada 2007? Jerry
2007-10-30 23:49 ` Ludovic Brenta
2007-10-31 11:33 ` Stephen Leake
2007-10-31 12:02 ` Ludovic Brenta
2007-11-01 11:16 ` Stephen Leake
2007-11-01 22:34 ` Adam Beneschan
2007-11-11 0:51 ` Brian Gaffney
2007-10-31 0:05 ` anon
2007-10-31 15:38 ` Georg Bauhaus
2007-11-01 9:26 ` Jerry
2007-11-04 12:07 ` Dirk Craeynest
2007-11-04 12:32 ` Markus E L
2007-11-04 21:55 ` Jerry [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox