From: Maciej Sobczak <see.my.homepage@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Only one Ada vendor?
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 12:42:40 -0700
Date: 2007-10-21T12:42:40-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1192995760.223264.210550@z24g2000prh.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3178697.p0Bn0lCN4l@linux1.krischik.com>
On 21 Pa , 19:23, Martin Krischik <krisc...@users.sourceforge.net>
wrote:
> The funny thing is: The is only one C and C++ vendor which *fully* supports
> C 99 and C++ 2003. Perhaps full standart compliance is out of fashion :-( .
It is not the issue of fashion, but rather demand - with no demand
there is obviously no pressure to spend resources to implement it.
Apparently there is no demand for *all* language features, which might
be a proof that some of them were defined over-eagerly. A lesson to
learn for language designers.
--
Maciej Sobczak * www.msobczak.com * www.inspirel.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-21 19:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-19 15:05 Only one Ada vendor? Sloan.Kohler
2007-10-20 0:49 ` Randy Brukardt
2007-10-20 2:08 ` Nasser Abbasi
2007-10-20 7:39 ` Simon Wright
2007-10-21 20:57 ` Florian Weimer
2007-10-21 17:23 ` Martin Krischik
2007-10-21 17:33 ` Gary Scott
2007-10-21 19:42 ` Maciej Sobczak [this message]
2007-10-21 23:57 ` Robert A Duff
2007-10-22 12:36 ` Georg Bauhaus
2007-10-22 20:55 ` Maciej Sobczak
2007-10-25 9:33 ` llothar
2007-10-25 9:58 ` Ludovic Brenta
2007-10-25 20:35 ` adaworks
2007-10-28 5:44 ` anon
2007-10-28 8:04 ` Pascal Obry
2007-10-28 11:13 ` Jerry van Dijk
2007-10-29 11:36 ` Georg Bauhaus
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox