From: Luke A. Guest <laguest@archeia.com>
Subject: Re: Tagged type naming convention
Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2017 23:43:06 +0000
Date: 2017-11-04T23:43:06+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1191720124.531531591.228791.laguest-archeia.com@nntp.aioe.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 2689fb89-cbde-4d32-9944-4c4c10c34e5e@googlegroups.com
Jere <jhb.chat@gmail.com> wrote:
use? Pros/Cons based
> on experience using it?
>
> One concern for it is consistency. It was presented with tagged
I use multiple for packages and single for types. Consistency is tricky. I
created a few interfaces today and used Drawables for package and Drawable
for the interface.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-04 23:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-04 16:50 Tagged type naming convention Jere
2017-11-04 23:43 ` Luke A. Guest [this message]
2017-11-07 0:32 ` Jere
2017-11-05 19:01 ` Jacob Sparre Andersen
2017-11-07 0:43 ` Jere
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox