From: Maciej Sobczak <see.my.homepage@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Inherited Methods and such
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 13:52:40 -0700
Date: 2007-09-29T13:52:40-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1191099160.227234.125330@r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <uuiy8hvdrhef$.8tiuhv6kgf8f$.dlg@40tude.net>
On 29 Wrz, 22:35, "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mail...@dmitry-kazakov.de>
wrote:
> > Yes, this example is convincing.
>
> No, it is not. Because aggregate is not a replacement for user-defined
> constructors.
>
> 1. It breaks encapsulation as you should make the record nature of type
> public.
Why it would make any difference?
The type is tagged and this is known. If it's tagged, then it has the
record nature - no way and no reason to hide it.
The record itself can be private, because the constructor function is
presumably in the same package.
> 2. The base type cannot enforce vital construction code, when records are
> exposed.
I don't understand this part.
> 3. Nothing can be done for destructors.
Right.
> 4. Dispatch upon construction completion and before destruction beginning
> is still impossible.
Why?
--
Maciej Sobczak
http://www.msobczak.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-29 20:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-17 14:26 Inherited Methods and such shaunpatterson
2007-09-17 15:11 ` Ludovic Brenta
2007-09-17 16:46 ` shaunpatterson
2007-09-17 19:07 ` Ludovic Brenta
2007-09-17 20:22 ` Maciej Sobczak
2007-09-17 21:07 ` Ludovic Brenta
2007-09-18 14:27 ` Maciej Sobczak
2007-09-18 14:27 ` Maciej Sobczak
2007-09-18 15:25 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2007-09-18 18:34 ` Ludovic Brenta
2007-09-18 19:29 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2007-09-18 19:39 ` Ludovic Brenta
2007-09-18 20:49 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2007-09-18 21:10 ` Simon Wright
2007-09-18 20:39 ` Maciej Sobczak
2007-09-18 21:12 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2007-09-19 14:49 ` Maciej Sobczak
2007-09-19 15:16 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2007-09-19 22:13 ` Maciej Sobczak
2007-09-20 8:12 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2007-09-20 13:52 ` Maciej Sobczak
2007-09-20 16:22 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2007-09-20 20:45 ` Maciej Sobczak
2007-09-21 18:59 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2007-09-21 21:02 ` Maciej Sobczak
2007-09-22 8:48 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2007-09-22 21:53 ` Maciej Sobczak
2007-09-23 8:41 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2007-09-23 20:36 ` Maciej Sobczak
2007-09-24 9:32 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2007-09-24 15:02 ` Maciej Sobczak
2007-09-24 19:20 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2007-09-25 20:53 ` Maciej Sobczak
2007-09-26 10:42 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2007-09-26 21:31 ` Maciej Sobczak
2007-09-27 15:02 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2007-09-27 21:02 ` Maciej Sobczak
2007-09-26 12:21 ` Robert A Duff
2007-09-26 12:54 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2007-09-26 21:37 ` Maciej Sobczak
2007-09-26 23:47 ` Randy Brukardt
2007-09-27 21:08 ` Maciej Sobczak
2007-09-28 0:44 ` Randy Brukardt
2007-09-28 20:32 ` Maciej Sobczak
2007-09-28 22:35 ` Randy Brukardt
2007-09-29 23:58 ` Robert A Duff
2007-09-26 12:26 ` Robert A Duff
2007-09-26 21:50 ` Maciej Sobczak
2007-09-26 22:20 ` Ray Blaak
2007-09-27 0:01 ` Randy Brukardt
2007-09-27 13:39 ` Robert A Duff
2007-09-27 14:54 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2007-09-28 0:35 ` Randy Brukardt
[not found] ` <7p6gc1s9imfa$.kmvwf5zyf8e9.dlg@40tude.net>
2007-09-28 22:53 ` Randy Brukardt
2007-09-29 20:37 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2007-09-27 21:23 ` Maciej Sobczak
2007-09-28 19:12 ` Robert A Duff
2007-09-28 19:02 ` Robert A Duff
2007-09-28 19:42 ` Robert A Duff
2007-09-28 20:44 ` Maciej Sobczak
2007-09-28 22:40 ` Randy Brukardt
2007-09-29 20:35 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2007-09-29 20:52 ` Maciej Sobczak [this message]
2007-09-30 8:38 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2007-09-29 23:47 ` Robert A Duff
2007-09-29 20:48 ` Maciej Sobczak
2007-09-29 23:39 ` Robert A Duff
2007-09-30 8:38 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2007-09-29 23:42 ` Robert A Duff
2007-09-25 1:59 ` Randy Brukardt
2007-09-25 8:59 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2007-09-25 21:02 ` Randy Brukardt
2007-09-26 12:42 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2007-09-18 4:03 ` Steve
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox