From: Georg Bauhaus <bauhaus+rm.tsoh@maps.futureapps.de>
Subject: Re: Q: recent Ada grammar for Ada tools ?
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 18:18:41 +0200
Date: 2007-09-20T18:18:41+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1190305120.14016.6.camel@sonnenregen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46ecfe08_4@news.bluewin.ch>
On Sun, 2007-09-16 at 11:58 +0200, Gautier wrote:
> Pascal Obry wrote:
> > Hi Gautier,
> >
> >> By "Ada tool", I mean ayacc or something newer.
> >> The best match I found is the Ada 95 grammar/lexer for yacc/lex on the
> >> AdaIC
> >> site. But all for C; at least a ayacc/aflex version would be better...
> >
> > I have an "old" aflex/ayacc link on my homepage. This is a fix for the
> > Irvive University (IIRC) version of aflex/ayacc... I just don't remember
> > if it is Ada83 or Ada95. Maybe a good start.
> >
> > Pascal.
>
> Sorry for being unclear: by "a ayacc/aflex version", I meant "a version [of the
> Ada 95 lexer/parser] for ayacc/aflex".
Wouldn't the sources of the LRM have the grammar rules marked up such
that they can be extracted? I have never seen the sources and
I don't know whether they are publicly available at all (like the
processed sources are).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-20 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-16 5:17 Q: recent Ada grammar for Ada tools ? Gautier
2007-09-16 7:10 ` Pascal Obry
2007-09-16 9:58 ` Gautier
2007-09-20 16:18 ` Georg Bauhaus [this message]
2007-09-20 18:17 ` Robert A Duff
2007-09-21 0:24 ` Randy Brukardt
2007-09-21 3:36 ` Georg Bauhaus
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox