From: Maciej Sobczak <see.my.homepage@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Java-Ada 2005 Syntax / Language Features Comparisons
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2007 23:44:11 -0700
Date: 2007-08-08T23:44:11-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1186641851.035873.250020@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1186604907.961690.311040@b79g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
On 8 Sie, 22:28, michael.mcn...@usma.edu wrote:
> Is anyone aware of a reference card or short document that shows
> equivalent Ada syntax and language features with those of Java.
>
> Students could use this to understand data structure concepts written
> in a book using Java, and then implement these concepts in code using
> Ada 2005. These students are CS majors and will have already taken a
> course in Ada.
If they are CS majors, then they should be able to think in terms of
abstracts and should not need such primitive cheat-sheets for 1:1
translations between languages.
I would even go further and say that the whole idea is broken at the
start. Java is reference-oriented whereas Ada is value-oriented, which
has significant consequences in how high-level concepts like
composition and aggregation are expressed in code - this goes much
further than syntax differences. Teaching people to recode some stuff
using "syntax equivalents" is a Bad Idea.
Just my 0.05 Euro.
--
Maciej Sobczak
http://www.msobczak.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-09 6:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-08 20:28 Java-Ada 2005 Syntax / Language Features Comparisons michael.mcnett
2007-08-09 6:44 ` Maciej Sobczak [this message]
2007-08-09 11:15 ` Georg Bauhaus
2007-08-09 12:33 ` michael.mcnett
2007-08-10 22:46 ` John McCormick
2007-08-11 2:08 ` michael.mcnett
2007-08-09 9:46 ` Anilkumar.T
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox