From: shaunpatterson@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Universal type
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2007 21:54:18 -0000
Date: 2007-08-03T21:54:18+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1186178058.059931.16460@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1186173305.970431.205500@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
Well... interesting enough, I realize I don't
need it. Without going into it much, we'll just
leave it at that.
And speaking of Java/C++/Ada. I have been working on a
messaging system that has a direct analog in a Java
front-end client to the C++/Ada backend. All the code
is essentially the same for every language.
I coded the Java system and the C++ backend system initially.
I have finally fully converted the C++ backend to Ada.
Looking back on the process, surprisingly Ada WOULD have
been the easiest if I had actually known Ada...
Thanks for the advice these past few weeks
--
Shaun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-03 21:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-03 18:28 Universal type shaunpatterson
2007-08-03 18:31 ` shaunpatterson
2007-08-03 19:10 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2007-08-03 20:35 ` Maciej Sobczak
2007-08-03 21:54 ` shaunpatterson [this message]
2007-08-04 1:10 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2007-08-04 7:21 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2007-08-03 23:03 ` Georg Bauhaus
2007-08-05 13:46 ` Martin Krischik
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox