From: shaunpatterson@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Byte streams
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2007 06:15:07 -0700
Date: 2007-08-03T06:15:07-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1186146907.760721.37370@x40g2000prg.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e7zsi.49923$Fc.32546@attbi_s21>
Yeah, I definitely don't feel "comfortable" doing
Unchecked_Conversions all over the place.
I think I'm going to change everything over to Streams
and use GNAT.Sockets. It seems this way works much
the same way as Java's ByteBuffer in reading/writing
integers, characters, etc safely.
Safety and correctness is what I want.
Thanks
--
Shaun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-03 13:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-02 19:21 Byte streams shaunpatterson
2007-08-02 20:18 ` Gautier
2007-08-02 20:27 ` tmoran
2007-08-02 21:44 ` Robert A Duff
2007-08-02 22:45 ` tmoran
2007-08-02 22:54 ` shaunpatterson
2007-08-03 5:34 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2007-08-03 13:15 ` shaunpatterson [this message]
2007-08-10 20:22 ` Simon Wright
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox