From: shaunpatterson@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Pointers explained?
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 22:38:24 -0000
Date: 2007-07-31T22:38:24+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1185921504.964168.187720@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4cslgd5ejxgp.rsknykje4paa$.dlg@40tude.net>
Thanks for all the help.
I figured I had to use "new" eventually. In C++, allocating memory
doesn't
seem to bother me - mainly because I'm confident with the language and
feel like I can control the program flow better. However, in Ada,
that whole
"Unchecked_Deallocation" bothers me... although I seem to have used it
effectively.
The "Unchecked" part just makes it seem like Ada provides a better
way...
Are there any version of GNAT that support garbage collection? I'm
working
with 10-15 year old government system. Perhaps I can convince them to
upgrade
to an Ada compiler with a garbage collector
--
Shaun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-31 22:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-30 17:53 Pointers explained? shaunpatterson
2007-07-30 17:56 ` shaunpatterson
2007-07-30 19:04 ` Ed Falis
2007-07-30 19:05 ` Ludovic Brenta
2007-07-30 19:36 ` Adam Beneschan
2007-07-30 21:23 ` Maciej Sobczak
2007-07-30 22:36 ` Adam Beneschan
2007-07-31 7:33 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2007-07-31 1:15 ` Anh Vo
2007-07-30 22:20 ` Adam Beneschan
2007-07-30 21:31 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2007-07-31 17:21 ` Simon Wright
2007-07-31 18:06 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2007-07-31 22:38 ` shaunpatterson [this message]
2007-08-01 7:53 ` Martin Krischik
2007-08-01 8:21 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2007-08-10 19:52 ` Simon Wright
2007-07-30 20:11 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2007-07-31 8:28 ` Martin Krischik
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-07-30 17:53 shaunpatterson
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox