Re: Factory Pattern

[Maciej Sobczak <see.my.homepage@gmail.com>]

On 28 Lip, 00:23, "Randy Brukardt" <ra...@rrsoftware.com> wrote:

> However, the requirement for this support came down from above; essentially,
> if we wanted Ada to continue to be an ISO standard, we needed to add this
> sort of support. (New standards for other languages also will have to add
> this sort of support, or take their chances at having their standards fail.)
> Even so, we did consider not doing it, but there was enough interest from
> some countries that we felt that there was quite a bit of risk that the
> standard would fail if we didn't add this support.

This is a very interesting twist in this discussion. I wonder how will
the next standardization iteration go for C++ - this is supposed to
happen in the coming few years and no support for Unicode in the
source representation was ever considered.
Interesting, interesting...

--
Maciej Sobczak
http://www.msobczak.com/