Re: "limited with" packages

[Adam Beneschan <adam@irvine.com>]

On Jun 20, 11:27 am, Anh Vo <anhvofrc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 20, 11:13 am, Adam Beneschan <a...@irvine.com> wrote:
>
> > On Jun 20, 9:27 am, adam.betts...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > This time the compiler is complaining that:
> > > 1) procedure get_type_one in the package body of my_package is "not
> > > fully conformant with declaration" in the spec and that,
> > > 2) the type of t_1 does not match
>
> > I think that's a compiler bug.
>
> I am not sure about that. The first thing to correct correct the
> syntax error as marked below

There were a number of errors that I just assumed didn't occur in the
actual code he was trying to compile.  You can't even get as far as he
did without making type_one "tagged private", since 'Class in
my_package's spec wouldn't be accepted on it.  So I'm assuming that
the code just wasn't typed into c.l.a correctly.

                 -- Adam