From: petter_fryklund@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: Porting problems from Solaris to Redhat Linux using GNAT 5.01a on both.
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 23:41:08 -0700
Date: 2007-06-19T23:41:08-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1182321668.365706.236410@u2g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <affmk4-7nc.ln1@newserver.thecreems.com>
Thanks for advice.
About Elaboration: Nothing needed to be done when using the right
compiler, which implies an bug in the very early compiler used
mistakenly. The cause of the circularity was that two packages with
cross-dependencies (each others 'Spec with from 'Body) would elaborate
the bodies just after corresponding specs. Newer compiler can postpone
elaboration of bodies. This is a complex OOD model with four (or more)
levels of generics that we will have difficulties to change.
About pragma Pack: I would very much have prefered to stay with rep
specs, but had no influence on the matter.
About pragma Pack: I don't see how the troublesome compiler could not
break (8). Perhaps rep spec should be there anyway as we say in
Sweden: using both belt and suspenders.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-20 6:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-19 8:56 Porting problems from Solaris to Redhat Linux using GNAT 5.01a on both petter_fryklund
2007-06-19 10:27 ` Alex R. Mosteo
2007-06-19 10:55 ` petter_fryklund
2007-06-19 13:02 ` petter_fryklund
2007-06-20 2:19 ` Jeffrey Creem
2007-06-20 6:41 ` petter_fryklund [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox