From: Georg Bauhaus <bauhaus@futureapps.de>
Subject: Re: is it safe do adopt CORBA?
Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 19:52:35 +0200
Date: 2007-05-18T19:52:35+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1179510755.27551.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1179508767.168693.47420@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 10:19 -0700, marcelo.batera@gmail.com wrote:
> Some of those articles even say CORBA is dead and claims SOAP is a
> better replacement, sometimes giving some techinical "advantages" of
> SOAP over CORBA.
For sure, CORBA wasn't intended to be a quick and dirty CGI successor.
I think that SOAP is better in _this_ regard.
> Also, we need efficiency (something SOAP doesn't
> give us) and the possibility to interact with other languages (such as
> Java) over the network (something annex e doesn't provide us) and even
> the integration with the user's desktop (gnome uses intensively CORBA
> in it's very core) is very tempting.
Have you considered evaluating PolyORB?
https://libre.adacore.com/polyorb/
J2EE literature says that CORBA is too low level. OTOH, I understand
you want to make specialized business software?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-18 17:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-18 17:19 is it safe do adopt CORBA? marcelo.batera
2007-05-18 17:52 ` Georg Bauhaus [this message]
2007-05-18 18:31 ` marcelo.batera
2007-05-18 18:32 ` marcelo.batera
2007-05-18 18:34 ` Jeffrey Creem
2007-05-18 20:11 ` JPWoodruff
2007-05-19 0:19 ` marcelo.batera
2007-05-19 23:26 ` Peter C. Chapin
2007-05-20 7:20 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2007-05-20 23:36 ` marcelo.batera
2007-05-21 15:35 ` Adam Beneschan
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox