From: vgodunko@rostel.ru
Subject: Re: ANN: QtAda preview available
Date: 6 May 2007 10:18:29 -0700
Date: 2007-05-06T10:18:29-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1178471909.009690.57720@y80g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1176738035.8013.15.camel@localhost>
On Apr 16, 7:40 pm, Georg Bauhaus <bauh...@futureapps.de> wrote:
> Some of the issues
> seem to be caused by heavy use of 2005 style access together
> with type conversions of .all objects. Is this by necessity,
> or is it more like a consequence of translating C++ style
> references into Ada access parameters? (Maybe then the binding
> can profit from cont T& correspond to just "in", not "access
> not null"?)
Such type conversions not related to argument passing conventions, its
a part of bindings architecture. It is possible to replace anonymous
access types and avoid conversions of .all objects, but this will
require to declare too many named access types.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-06 17:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-12 11:43 ANN: QtAda preview available vgodunko
2007-04-12 13:45 ` Martin Krischik
2007-04-12 13:51 ` vgodunko
2007-04-14 16:33 ` Dirk Heinrichs
2007-04-14 18:46 ` Ludovic Brenta
2007-04-14 20:36 ` Simon Wright
2007-04-15 9:30 ` Martin Krischik
2007-04-15 7:33 ` Dirk Heinrichs
2007-04-16 4:54 ` vgodunko
2007-04-15 9:28 ` Martin Krischik
2007-04-16 4:59 ` vgodunko
2007-04-16 7:22 ` Martin Krischik
2007-04-16 15:40 ` Georg Bauhaus
2007-05-06 17:18 ` vgodunko [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox