From: prichtmyer@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: A physical comparison of Ada 95 and Ada 2005
Date: 21 Jan 2007 12:07:40 -0800
Date: 2007-01-21T12:07:40-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1169410060.556386.298760@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 45b3695f$0$22525$39db0f71@news.song.fi
Perhaps Ada 2005 is not the only (as they say here) "dense" thing
around :-)
Yeah - I have a little too much time too
thanks for the laugh
Peter
It WAS supposed to be funny, right? :-)
Niklas Holsti wrote:
> A few days ago I received an eagerly awaited Springer hard-copy of the
> Ada 2005 LRM (courtesy of Ada Europe, to whom many thanks).
-- deleted some --
The result of this comparison is thus
> that Ada 2005 is 44.9% denser than Ada 95, as represented by their
> respective LRMs. The analogous comparison based on the text of the LRMs
> was not in scope for this study :-)
>
> --
> Niklas Holsti
> Tidorum Ltd
> niklas holsti tidorum fi
> . @ .
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-21 20:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-21 13:29 A physical comparison of Ada 95 and Ada 2005 Niklas Holsti
2007-01-21 20:07 ` prichtmyer [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox