From: "Alinabi" <alexander.the.average@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: multicdore-multithreading benchmarks
Date: 18 Dec 2006 19:08:28 -0800
Date: 2006-12-18T19:08:28-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1166497708.533742.140650@48g2000cwx.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <tY6dnf9zG8bDzhrYnZ2dnUVZ_uOmnZ2d@comcast.com>
Here are 5 different runs, for statistical purposes. Compiled with
gnatmake -O3.
Let me know if you want me to try other switches.
Run 1:
CPUs N= 1000 N= 10000 N= 100000 N= 1000000
1 0.000142750 0.001998500 0.023578000 0.162093000
2 0.000078750 0.001163750 0.012594250 0.103046500
3 0.000078750 0.000876500 0.008899750 0.081707750
4 0.000078750 0.001040500 0.009002500 0.085632000
5 0.000079000 0.001277250 0.008339250 0.071098500
6 0.000079000 0.001148750 0.008171250 0.071358750
7 0.000079000 0.001434250 0.010027500 0.063942500
8 0.000079000 0.001490750 0.008093750 0.064089000
Run 2:
CPUs N= 1000 N= 10000 N= 100000 N= 1000000
1 0.000133500 0.002041500 0.023057000 0.160626250
2 0.000074750 0.001211250 0.010813500 0.105832000
3 0.000074250 0.000863750 0.007667750 0.070813000
4 0.000074000 0.000876000 0.008855750 0.047772500
5 0.000075250 0.000863000 0.008994750 0.049151250
6 0.000074000 0.001062500 0.007130750 0.049553500
7 0.000074250 0.001249750 0.007859750 0.051682000
8 0.000074250 0.001496000 0.008086000 0.061584250
Run 3:
CPUs N= 1000 N= 10000 N= 100000 N= 1000000
1 0.000145500 0.001793500 0.023460750 0.154006250
2 0.000079250 0.001111250 0.012812750 0.137050500
3 0.000143000 0.001504750 0.012376500 0.105685000
4 0.000145750 0.001228000 0.011719000 0.095653250
5 0.000079500 0.001309500 0.011715500 0.077465000
6 0.000079750 0.001695000 0.011437000 0.078212500
7 0.000144250 0.001776000 0.010947500 0.076057500
8 0.000079750 0.001518000 0.011901750 0.075582500
Run 4:
CPUs N= 1000 N= 10000 N= 100000 N= 1000000
1 0.000140250 0.001837250 0.020237750 0.152752500
2 0.000077500 0.001121500 0.012037750 0.130276250
3 0.000077750 0.001041750 0.007699500 0.077842750
4 0.000077750 0.001173250 0.007399250 0.070188750
5 0.000077750 0.000950000 0.007958250 0.069657000
6 0.000077750 0.001154000 0.008442750 0.068289000
7 0.000078000 0.001137500 0.009036750 0.065445000
8 0.000078000 0.001197000 0.009599500 0.064271500
Run 5:
CPUs N= 1000 N= 10000 N= 100000 N= 1000000
1 0.000143000 0.001761500 0.023593000 0.165574250
2 0.000079250 0.001087250 0.011648750 0.149709000
3 0.000079250 0.001099250 0.011416750 0.085586250
4 0.000079250 0.000976250 0.010137750 0.086734250
5 0.000079250 0.001110500 0.009749000 0.077554500
6 0.000079250 0.001242750 0.010455250 0.070517250
7 0.000079000 0.001301750 0.008186750 0.065894500
8 0.000079250 0.001370000 0.008127750 0.065806000
On Dec 18, 9:50 pm, tmo...@acm.org wrote:
> >I have a dual dual-core 64 bit machine (dual AMD Opteron). Where can I
> >get the code?home.comcast.net/~twmoran/trysortn.zip
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-19 3:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-19 1:22 multicdore-multithreading benchmarks tmoran
2006-12-19 1:44 ` Alinabi
2006-12-19 2:50 ` tmoran
2006-12-19 3:08 ` Alinabi [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox