From: Luke A. Guest <laguest@archeia.com>
Subject: Re: Ada for the JVM?
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 00:31:42 +0000
Date: 2016-03-16T00:31:42+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1152380641.479781031.915533.laguest-archeia.com@nntp.aioe.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 5d0d30bd-4d97-45f1-af6c-98ec1509508b@googlegroups.com
David Botton <david@botton.com> wrote:
>> Pure GPL though 👎👎👎
>
> Someone may be confused with the GPL on the compiler which is no issues,
> it is only that they use the technicality that one can removed the
> runtime exceptions at will to create a shareware version with GPL virused runtimes.
>
> David Botton
>
>
True but any runtime will be GPL and any tools generating Ada bindings to
Java will be also. Plus the Ada.Interfaces.Java packages will be too.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-16 0:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-14 2:26 Ada for the JVM? egarrulo
2016-03-14 12:09 ` G.B.
2016-03-14 12:27 ` Luke A. Guest
2016-03-15 0:46 ` David Botton
2016-03-16 0:31 ` Luke A. Guest [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox