From: Georg Bauhaus <bauhaus@futureapps.de>
Subject: Re: Possibly fixed in gcc 4.1.1, but bug box -- Was: Re: A smaller self contained test case ...
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 10:51:31 +0200
Date: 2006-06-28T10:49:39+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1151484691.24349.25.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1151484112.998493.14620@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com>
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 01:41 -0700, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
> So, GCC 4.1 is quite useable and
> appropriate for most purposes; Robert Dewar himself confirmed so,
> verbally, during FOSDEM.
Also that they are looking forward to using the 4 series, IIRC,
as the new compilers have more optimizations.
I know that some compiler makers don't like performance comparisons
other than their own, but anyway, among the qualities of compilers
is the speed of executable code. I know about GNAT and ObjectAda on
Windows. GNAT wins, ObjectAda is o.K.. Any other estimates for other
compilers?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-28 8:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-20 16:56 Compiler Bug or what I'm doing wrong? M E Leypold
2006-06-21 7:44 ` Ludovic Brenta
2006-06-21 12:29 ` M E Leypold
2006-06-21 12:46 ` Alex R. Mosteo
2006-06-21 13:23 ` M E Leypold
2006-06-22 19:10 ` Simon Wright
2006-06-23 8:24 ` Ludovic Brenta
2006-06-23 13:14 ` Alex R. Mosteo
2006-06-23 13:24 ` Alex R. Mosteo
2006-06-24 20:33 ` Simon Wright
2006-06-24 20:56 ` M E Leypold
2006-06-26 7:32 ` Ludovic Brenta
2006-06-26 11:16 ` M E Leypold
2006-06-26 12:13 ` [Ada in Debian] GtkAda and GNAT versions Ludovic Brenta
2006-06-26 12:25 ` M E Leypold
2006-06-27 20:55 ` Compiler Bug or what I'm doing wrong? Simon Wright
2006-06-27 22:26 ` Ludovic Brenta
2006-06-22 2:07 ` James Dennett
2006-06-22 6:37 ` Duncan Sands
2006-06-22 16:53 ` M E Leypold
2006-06-22 19:01 ` Pascal Obry
2006-06-23 8:37 ` M E Leypold
2006-06-22 19:05 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-06-23 4:47 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-06-23 12:26 ` Stephen Leake
2006-06-23 13:11 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-06-23 13:15 ` Alex R. Mosteo
2006-06-23 9:55 ` A smaller self contained test case. Was: " M E Leypold
2006-06-23 10:03 ` M E Leypold
2006-06-23 11:04 ` And a Workaround: Was: A smaller test case / Compiler Bug M E Leypold
2006-06-23 11:12 ` Possible memory leaks when reading/writing variant records M E Leypold
2006-06-24 11:46 ` A smaller self contained test case. Was: Compiler Bug or what I'm doing wrong? Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-06-24 12:27 ` M E Leypold
2006-06-24 12:52 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-06-24 13:53 ` M E Leypold
2006-06-24 19:58 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-06-24 20:22 ` M E Leypold
2006-06-25 7:59 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-06-25 10:51 ` M E Leypold
2006-06-26 6:22 ` Martin Dowie
2006-06-24 21:21 ` M E Leypold
2006-06-25 21:36 ` M E Leypold
2006-06-26 21:53 ` Possibly fixed in gcc 4.1.1, but bug box -- Was: Re: A smaller self contained test case M E Leypold
2006-06-27 18:24 ` Alex R. Mosteo
2006-06-27 22:58 ` M E Leypold
2006-06-28 10:32 ` Alex R. Mosteo
2006-07-03 1:38 ` Steve Whalen
2006-07-03 10:36 ` M E Leypold
2006-06-28 8:41 ` Ludovic Brenta
2006-06-28 8:51 ` Georg Bauhaus [this message]
2006-06-28 10:43 ` Alex R. Mosteo
2006-06-23 10:00 ` Compiler Bug or what I'm doing wrong? M E Leypold
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox