From: Georg Bauhaus <bauhaus@futureapps.de>
Subject: Re: null records and box
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 16:44:39 +0200
Date: 2006-06-20T16:43:36+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1150814679.12414.19.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Wv6dnfBs7-1ZqwrZnZ2dnUVZ_sCdnZ2d@megapath.net>
On Mon, 2006-06-19 at 18:44 -0500, Randy Brukardt wrote:
> It certainly was my intent that you could
> write "(others => <>)" for a null record ...
> Anyway, I'll check with the ARG (just because it was *my* intent -- and one
> tht John also expected -- doesn't mean that it was really intended).
Thanks, also for the nice new language you have made.
As far as I've got so far, it feels much more permissive
and to have fewer edges. And some things are frighteningly
quicker to write. Now if that isn't a major improvement ... ;-)
-- Georg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-20 14:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-17 15:50 Q: null records and box Georg Bauhaus
2006-06-19 23:44 ` Randy Brukardt
2006-06-20 14:44 ` Georg Bauhaus [this message]
2006-06-20 20:32 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-06-20 21:54 ` Georg Bauhaus
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox