From: gshapovalov@gmail.com
Subject: Re: GtkAda License Question
Date: 20 Jun 2006 00:51:49 -0700
Date: 2006-06-20T00:51:49-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1150789909.682969.127440@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8lMlg.5561$E02.1837@newsb.telia.net>
Björn Persson wrote:
> Hmmmmm? Then the typical "you don't even have the right to sneeze" EULA
> wouldn't have any legal force either.
Well, accordingly to what I have read on the subject they do not. In
fact it usually is worded like this: EULA(s) will not hold up in the
court, should the case be raised. And I seem to remember the claims
that this was indeed already demonstrated on some occasions. However I
am skimpy on the details, sorry.
And, as usual - do not take anything I am saying about legalities
seriously - check everything you need to rely on yourself..
George
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-20 7:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-19 11:11 GtkAda License Question M E Leypold
2006-06-19 11:48 ` Ludovic Brenta
2006-06-19 20:28 ` M E Leypold
2006-06-20 5:11 ` Ludovic Brenta
2006-06-20 8:46 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2006-06-20 9:57 ` M E Leypold
2006-06-21 17:11 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2006-06-21 18:23 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-06-21 21:23 ` Georg Bauhaus
2006-06-20 13:31 ` Georg Bauhaus
2006-06-20 13:42 ` Frank J. Lhota
2006-06-20 15:03 ` M E Leypold
2006-06-20 15:25 ` M E Leypold
2006-06-20 6:12 ` Björn Persson
2006-06-20 7:51 ` gshapovalov [this message]
2006-06-20 7:48 ` gshapovalov
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox