From: "Ludovic Brenta" <ludovic@ludovic-brenta.org>
Subject: Re: Multi-arch
Date: 19 May 2006 00:23:41 -0700
Date: 2006-05-19T00:23:41-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1148023421.378001.90560@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <wC5bg.659$E02.248@newsb.telia.net>
Björn Persson a écrit :
> Is multi-arch useful in an altogether free system in some way that eludes me?
Yes.
Today, for example, OpenOffice works only on 32-bit architectures; if
you want to run it on an amd64 machine, you need biarch or multiarch.
There are probably other cases where compiling for one of the
architectures in a multi-arch system is problematic.
Also, 32-bit binaries use less memory than 64-bit binaries do. It makes
sense to run 32-bit binaries on 64-bit machines, if those binaries do
not benefit from the larger address space or 64-bit instructions.
Another benefit of multiarch is that you can e.g. compile i386 binaries
on an amd64 machine and run them on i386 machines.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-19 7:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-17 9:22 Multi-arch Ludovic Brenta
2006-05-17 9:45 ` Multi-arch Georg Bauhaus
2006-05-17 20:31 ` Multi-arch gshapovalov
2006-05-18 11:39 ` Multi-arch Ludovic Brenta
2006-05-18 16:34 ` Multi-arch gshapovalov
2006-05-18 21:24 ` Multi-arch Björn Persson
2006-05-19 7:23 ` Ludovic Brenta [this message]
2006-05-19 21:16 ` Multi-arch Björn Persson
2006-05-20 11:18 ` Multi-arch Ludovic Brenta
2006-05-20 17:51 ` Multi-arch Björn Persson
2006-05-21 16:03 ` Multi-arch Dr. Adrian Wrigley
2006-05-21 13:05 ` Multi-arch Dr. Adrian Wrigley
2006-05-21 13:41 ` Multi-arch Ludovic Brenta
2006-05-21 16:07 ` Multi-arch Dr. Adrian Wrigley
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox