From: Georg Bauhaus <bauhaus@futureapps.de>
Subject: Re: of possible interest
Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 00:25:46 +0200
Date: 2006-05-08T00:24:59+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1147040746.9037.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060507223701.175e2ec9@localhost.darkstar>
On Sun, 2006-05-07 at 22:37 +0200, Frederic Praca wrote:
> Le Sun, 07 May 2006 17:56:15 GMT,
> Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> a écrit :
>
> > On Sun, 07 May 2006 14:54:47 +0200, Ludovic Brenta
> > <ludovic@ludovic-brenta.org> declaimed the following in comp.lang.ada:
> >
> > >
> > > - Java allows programmer to ignore the return value of functions.
> > > What if the return value was important? This is unsafe.
> > >
> > Off-hand -- this is a wash... Ada requires one to /account
> > for/ the presence of the return value, but it can still be just as
> > easily ignored...
> >
> > begin
> > dummy := some_function(some_argument);
> > -- dummy is never made use of; effectively
> > ignored end;
> Yes but in this case, everybody knows you explicitly ingore the
> return value, you didn't forget it by mistake.
Does anyone know how relevant this is in practice,
given in mistakes per product, or increased development
cost?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-07 22:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-04 19:05 of possible interest Marco
2006-05-04 19:26 ` Ludovic Brenta
2006-05-04 23:30 ` Georg Bauhaus
2006-05-05 2:49 ` Ed Falis
2006-05-05 14:40 ` Ludovic Brenta
2006-05-07 7:46 ` Nasser Abbasi
2006-05-07 11:50 ` Larry Kilgallen
2006-05-07 12:54 ` Ludovic Brenta
[not found] ` <0gcs52lejunc5qar09mf2mng2kg8kumedk@4ax.com>
2006-05-07 20:37 ` Frederic Praca
2006-05-07 22:25 ` Georg Bauhaus [this message]
2006-05-08 7:26 ` Ludovic Brenta
2006-05-09 0:41 ` Robert A Duff
2006-05-11 22:25 ` David Emery
2006-05-12 15:45 ` Pascal Obry
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox