comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "zeta_no" <olivier_henley@hotmail.com>
Subject: Why C for the Open Source Movement?
Date: 6 May 2006 12:28:47 -0700
Date: 2006-05-06T12:28:47-07:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1146943727.180033.286070@j73g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> (raw)

Hi to all,

Can someone explain me the reasons why the main actors of the Open
Source community didn't choose Ada instead of C to write the core
elements of their systems (Linux, Hurd, FreeBSD etc...) and most of the
critical applications that come with it if the main goal was to provide
a real alternative to the "proprietary clan".  Would it have reduce
significantly bug list for all devel. projects and assure much more
reliable applications?  Isn't the Unix tradition based on well crafted
design mecanisms?  Does its traditional ways became so heavy to prevent
adaptation and or renewal of its philosophy through time?

Hope I do not make a troll of me,

olivier h.




             reply	other threads:[~2006-05-06 19:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-06 19:28 zeta_no [this message]
2006-05-06 19:55 ` Why C for the Open Source Movement? Jeffrey Creem
2006-05-08  3:46   ` kevin  cline
2006-05-08  9:05   ` Ludovic Brenta
2006-05-08  9:13 ` Ludovic Brenta
2006-05-08 12:05   ` Georg Bauhaus
2006-05-08 13:12   ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-06-06 14:24   ` thvv
2006-06-06 15:35     ` Ludovic Brenta
2006-06-06 15:47       ` Ed Falis
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox