Re: Type safety, C++ and code generation

["REH" <spamjunk@stny.rr.com>]

Maciej Sobczak wrote:
> REH wrote:
>
> >>http://www.msobczak.com/prog/typegen/
>
> > You maybe interested in a C++ class that I wrote.
>
> Been there, done that:
>
> http://www.msobczak.com/prog/downloads.html
>
> (see safetypes.tar.gz and range.tar.gz)
>
> I have dropped this idea because I think that the external code
> generator is much more flexible and more powerful with regard to the
> type safety that can be gained. Range checking is just one little part
> of what is needed. Template classes are fine if you can afford limiting
> yourself only to this little part, but that's not usually the case.
>
>
> --
I just took a look at the code to pointed to above.  It is much
different then mine:
1) yours allows for undefined behavior by not checking for overflows
before doing the operations.
2) yours does not eliminate unnecessary checks.
3) yours does not allow intermidate results to exceed the bounds of the
range.  For example, given a variable x, with a range of [0, 100],
yours will fail on x = (x * 1000) / 1000, mine will not.
4) yours does not allow for types larger than long, such as unsigned
long or implementation-specific types such as long long.
5) yours does not check for division-by-zero.

Think you are being dismissive without even looking at it.
REH